<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bloglines vs Google Reader</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kishore.org/2007/02/21/bloglines-vs-google-reader/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kishore.org/2007/02/21/bloglines-vs-google-reader/</link>
	<description>With kind words, you can change the world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 13:20:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Adam Newbold</title>
		<link>http://www.kishore.org/2007/02/21/bloglines-vs-google-reader/comment-page-1/#comment-103</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Newbold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2007 05:06:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kishore.org/2007/02/21/bloglines-vs-google-reader/#comment-103</guid>
		<description>Probably the most disappointing thing about Google Reader is that there&#039;s no search feature.  You&#039;d think a company that has what is arguably the best search technology would be able to let people search through their feeds (or their starred items).  I guess it could still show up at some point, still being a Labs product at this stage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Probably the most disappointing thing about Google Reader is that there&#8217;s no search feature.  You&#8217;d think a company that has what is arguably the best search technology would be able to let people search through their feeds (or their starred items).  I guess it could still show up at some point, still being a Labs product at this stage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
